MarketThoughts.com Home Page
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups  StatisticsStatistics   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Latest ECRI Weekly Leading Index Readings
Goto page 1, 2, 3 ... 22, 23, 24  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    MarketThoughts.com Forum Index -> Market Commentary
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Latest ECRI Weekly Leading Index Readings
HenryTo
Site Admin
Site Admin


Joined: 06 Aug 2004
Posts: 9670
Location: Houston, Texas & Los Angeles, California

PostPosted: Sun Jun 26, 2005 9:25 am    Post subject: Latest ECRI Weekly Leading Index Readings Reply with quote

For some reason, the ECRI doesn't publish weekly press releases anymore on its Weekly Leading Index readings - although one can still get access to the weekly readings via a (free) registration.

For the week ending June 17, 2005, the Weekly Leading Index level is at 133.4 - a growth rate of 0.2% from last year. I will try to update this thread every week from now on.

Hope everyone is having a great Sunday!

Henry

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Post new topic   Reply to topic    MarketThoughts.com Forum Index -> Market Commentary
Author Latest ECRI Weekly Leading Index Readings Replies
HenryTo
Site Admin
Site Admin


Joined: 06 Aug 2004
Posts: 9670
Location: Houston, Texas & Los Angeles, California

PostPosted: Fri Jul 23, 2010 11:46 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

For the week ending 7/16/2010

WLI = 120.7
Annual ROC = -10.5%

Last week's WLI was revised to 120.7, while the annual ROC was unchanged.

WLI Unchanged, Growth Rate Drops
Reuters
July 23, 2010

(Retuers) - A measure of future U.S. economic growth was unchanged in the latest week, a research group said on Friday.

The Economic Cycle Research Institute, a New York-based independent forecasting group, said its Weekly Leading Index stood at 120.7 in the week ended July 16, unchanged from the week earlier, which was originally reported as 120.6.

The index's annualized growth rate fell to minus 10.5 percent from minus 9.8 percent a week ago, its lowest level since May 15, 2009, when it stood at minus 11.1 percent.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
rffrydr
Moderator
Moderator


Joined: 30 Oct 2005
Posts: 12915
Location: Sunny California

PostPosted: Fri Jul 16, 2010 1:13 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

That's good enough for the "double-dippers"...at no time....
_________________
Today is the Tomorrow you worried about Yesterday!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
HenryTo
Site Admin
Site Admin


Joined: 06 Aug 2004
Posts: 9670
Location: Houston, Texas & Los Angeles, California

PostPosted: Fri Jul 16, 2010 9:25 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

For the week ending 7/9/2010

WLI = 120.6
Annual ROC = -9.8%

Last week's WLI was revised to 120.6, while the annual ROC was revised to -9.1%.

US econ growth gauge unchanged in latest week-ECRI

July 16 (Reuters) - A measure of future U.S. economic growth was unchanged in the latest week, a research group said on Friday. The Economic Cycle Research Institute, a New York-based independent forecasting group, said its Weekly Leading Index stood at 120.6 for the week ended July 9, unchanged from the previous week, which was originally reported as 121.5. The index was last below 120.6 in the week of July 24, 2009, when it measured 120.3, according to ECRI. The index's annualized growth rate fell to minus 9.8 percent from minus 9.1 percent the previous week, originally reported as minus 8.3 percent.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
HenryTo
Site Admin
Site Admin


Joined: 06 Aug 2004
Posts: 9670
Location: Houston, Texas & Los Angeles, California

PostPosted: Fri Jul 09, 2010 3:46 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

For the week ending 7/2/2010

WLI = 121.5
Annual ROC = -8.3%

Last week's WLI was revised to 122.3, while the annual ROC was revised to -7.6%.

WLI Growth Falls Further
Reuters
July 09, 2010

(Reuters) - A measure of future U.S. economic growth fell to the lowest since July 2009, indicating that the economy will continue to slow, a research group said on Friday.

The Economic Cycle Research Institute, a New York-based independent forecasting group, said its Weekly Leading Index fell to 121.5 for the week ended July 2, down from 122.3 in the prior week. That was the lowest level since July 24, 2009 when it stood at 120.3. The index's annualized growth rate fell to -8.3 percent after a -7.6 percent growth rate a week earlier.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
rffrydr
Moderator
Moderator


Joined: 30 Oct 2005
Posts: 12915
Location: Sunny California

PostPosted: Tue Jul 06, 2010 11:55 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote





Quote:
Your eyes aren't lying. The r-squared, or percentage of variance, explained for the ECRI index by the S&P 500 is 0.97. We can start playing around with other components of the index to solve those large explanatory gaps before 1983, but the gain is small for the effort involved. Moreover, the recent fit is suspiciously tight.


http://www.minyanville.com/businessmarkets/articles/howard-simons-leading-indicators-s2526p-index/6/28/2010/id/28914
_________________
Today is the Tomorrow you worried about Yesterday!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
HenryTo
Site Admin
Site Admin


Joined: 06 Aug 2004
Posts: 9670
Location: Houston, Texas & Los Angeles, California

PostPosted: Fri Jul 02, 2010 2:56 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

For the week ending 6/25/2010

WLI = 122.2
Annual ROC = -7.7%

No revisions to last week's readings.

WLI Growth Drops
ECRI
July 02, 2010

(ECRI) - A measure of future economic growth fell slightly in the latest week, while its annualized growth rate continued to decline, indicating the economy is about to slow, a research group said on Friday.

The Economic Cycle Research Institute, a New York-based independent forecasting group, said its Weekly Leading Index slipped to 122.2 in the week ended June 25 from 122.9 the week before.

The index's annualized growth rate fell to minus 7.7 percent from minus 6.9 percent the prior week.

That was its lowest level since May 22, 2009 when it stood at minus 8.7 percent.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
rffrydr
Moderator
Moderator


Joined: 30 Oct 2005
Posts: 12915
Location: Sunny California

PostPosted: Wed Jun 30, 2010 10:36 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

US economy

Published: June 29 2010 15:12 | Last updated: June 29 2010 18:46


Quote:
Economists, it is said, have predicted eight of the past three recessions. So what about the latest warnings that a US double dip is imminent? Indicators galore support this conclusion but more sanguine analysts, who still represent Wall Street’s consensus, accuse the glass-half-empty crowd of data-mining or ignoring other, more upbeat facts.

It is at times such as this that the Economic Cycle Research Institute, noted for its prescience, longevity and impartiality in predicting business cycles, enters the argument. Respected observers of the economy such as David Rosenberg, Albert Edwards, John Mauldin and John Hussman, all of whom burnished their credibility ahead of the last downturn, have cited a pronounced slide in the ECRI’s Weekly Leading Index recently. Mr Hussman says its recent rate of change has only produced one false prediction of a recession, in 1988.


I think we live in challenging time for our "indicators." Look at what the triple-ETFs and machine trading are doing to Lowry's 90% days and currency trade to our international "diversification." Acuthuan senses this and has been hedging his indicator.
_________________
Today is the Tomorrow you worried about Yesterday!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
HenryTo
Site Admin
Site Admin


Joined: 06 Aug 2004
Posts: 9670
Location: Houston, Texas & Los Angeles, California

PostPosted: Sat Jun 26, 2010 4:44 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

For the week ending 6/18/2010

WLI = 122.9
Annual ROC = -6.9%

Last week's WLI was revised to 122.4, while the annual ROC was revised to -5.8%.

WLI Growth at 56-Week Low
Reuters
June 25, 2010

(Reuters) - A measure of future U.S.economic growth rose slightly in the latest week, but its annualized growth rate continued to fall, indicating the economy is about to slow, a research group said on Friday.The Economic Cycle Research Institute, a New York-based independent forecasting group, said its Weekly Leading Index rose to 122.9 in the week ended June 18, up from 122.4 the prior week, originally reported as 122.5.

The index's annualized growth rate fell to minus 6.9 percent from a revised minus 5.8 percent, originally reported as minus 5.7 percent. That was its lowest level since May 22, 2009, when it stood at minus 8.7 percent. "After falling for six weeks, the uptick in the level of the Weekly Leading Index suggests some tentative stabilization, but the continuing decline in its growth rate to a 56-week low underscores the inevitability of the slowdown," said Lakshman Achuthan, managing director of ECRI.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
HenryTo
Site Admin
Site Admin


Joined: 06 Aug 2004
Posts: 9670
Location: Houston, Texas & Los Angeles, California

PostPosted: Sat Jun 19, 2010 1:05 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

For the week ending 6/11/2010

WLI = 122.5
Annual ROC = -5.7%

Last week's WLI was revised to 123.0, while the annual ROC was revised to -3.7%.

WLI Growth Drops
Dow Jones Newswires
June 18, 2010

(Dow Jones) - Growth in the ECRI weekly leading index fell further into negative territory.

The growth rate for the week of June 11 weakened to -5.7%, down from -3.7% in the previous week, which had been the first negative reading in almost a year.

"Despite the WLI's rapid drop over the last six weeks, its downturn has not been sustained enough to signal an imminent recession," said Lakshman Achuthan, ECRI director. Growth in the May index dropped to 1.5% from 14.1% in April.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
rffrydr
Moderator
Moderator


Joined: 30 Oct 2005
Posts: 12915
Location: Sunny California

PostPosted: Sat Jun 12, 2010 8:46 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

We're still in the plus in Philly:

http://www.philadelphiafed.org/research-and-data/real-time-center/business-conditions-index/

What makes this a big plus, to my way of thinking, is the ZIRP backdrop. Latchuthan has learned to put a discount on that market component of his series. He's definitely more optimistic than his indicator. Maybe that's a "third world" thing. Wink
_________________
Today is the Tomorrow you worried about Yesterday!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
HenryTo
Site Admin
Site Admin


Joined: 06 Aug 2004
Posts: 9670
Location: Houston, Texas & Los Angeles, California

PostPosted: Fri Jun 11, 2010 7:27 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

For the week ending 6/4/2010

WLI = 123.2
Annual ROC = -3.5%

Last week's WLI was revised to 124.0, while the annual ROC was revised to 0.3%.

WLI Drops, But No Double-Dip Yet
Barron's
June 11, 2010

(Barron's) - The Economic Cycle Research Institute today offered up its view of last week’s “weekly leading indicators,” a closely watched private mailing, today showed a dip in the indicator for the week ended last Friday to 123.2, a decline of 3.5%, in contrast to the 0.3% rise the preceding week.

The Institute’s Lakshman Achuthan, however, remarked that “While the plunge in WLI growth to a one-year low assures a significant slowing in U.S. economic growth in the coming months, the recent weakness has not lasted long enough to signal a new recession threat.”

The ECRI notice follows better-than-expected consumer confidence data this morning from the University of Michigan, but also a smaller-than-expected gain in business inventories in Apri, this morning’s weak retail sales data for May and, of course, last Friday’s disappointing jobs number.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
smile
Experienced Poster
Experienced Poster


Joined: 27 Mar 2010
Posts: 66

PostPosted: Fri Jun 04, 2010 10:38 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Ven wrote:
Since the excess liquidity has yet to be withdrawn,
how do you explain the market's recent breakdown if QE was a panacea?

The market reached extreme oversold levels and only needed reason to bounce.

QE was a sentiment catalyst or merely coincided with the turn.

Don't believe the Japan scenario if you don't want to...I see there are many permabulls here.

Technical breakdown in the market.
The drop in LI's.
Corporate bond and high yield collapses.
Forex developments.

All suggest that we have started C-down.


__________

no perma bull here, but I know enough not to bet against the Fed. at zero interest rates + QE

Fed stopped buying MBS at the end of April and is setting up to do reverse repos as the economy catches hold to organic growth. It is a balancing act for the fed to complete.

The easy explanation for the market's recent breakdown is PIIGS and fear of contagion. If you were in the market in 1998 you could relate. I was in cash so I dodged that bullet, but everyone poopoo'd the effects of that contagion too till it hit US square upside the head. Most have a stinging recollection of the '98 contagion and would just assumed be in cash if it catches hold.

Also I think the US growth estimates on GDP were way too optimistic... many went from a 2 handle blowing right up to 5+ which would explain the froth... if one believes in the relationship between GDP growth and earnings growth.

It was not just Quant easing that saved our bacon... it was a series of good policy decisions by this administration. Everyone ragged on this administration for the fiscal stimulus... not realizing what the consequences were when states ran into the red and would have to start cutting teachers, firefighters and police etc. to balance budgets. Of course that did not happen this time because 1/3rd of the stimulus went to states to fill their budget gaps. Debt is bad but in this case it was necessary lest we revisit the '29 style collapse. Remember mark to market - once FASB was flipped on this, + the Administration demonstrated it would do whatever it took - the markets took off like a scalded dog...

it is not just one thing that turns fear and the armageddon trade from being reality... QE was in the tool bag along with good policy decisions, TARP, fed discount window open etc., a president who is smart enough not to go into Iraq, and is smart enough to know what happens when the private sector collapses back in March... just before the fiscal stimulus which passed in Jan. began pumping dollars to impacted states... 1/3rd going to states, 1/3rd going to affected workers - unemployment & cobra support etc., and 1/3 going to shovel ready projects which.

BTW I do not disbelieve your Japan scenario, I just know we are not Japan. I guess I could have saved myself a lot of typing if I had simply lead with this paragraph... sometimes I get carried away Smile
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Ven
Senior Poster
Senior Poster


Joined: 30 Dec 2009
Posts: 82

PostPosted: Fri Jun 04, 2010 8:18 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Since the excess liquidity has yet to be withdrawn,
how do you explain the market's recent breakdown if QE was a panacea?

The fact is no market goes straight to zero.

Go back and look at the inverted h&s and the lack of panic by insiders after C's bailout in Nov. '08 and you'll see the Jan-March '09 plunge was intentional.

The market reached extreme oversold levels and only needed reason to bounce.

QE was a sentiment catalyst or merely coincided with the turn.

Don't believe the Japan scenario if you don't want to...I see there are many permabulls here.

Technical breakdown in the market.
The drop in LI's.
Corporate bond and high yield collapses.
Forex developments.

All suggest that we have started C-down.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
smile
Experienced Poster
Experienced Poster


Joined: 27 Mar 2010
Posts: 66

PostPosted: Fri Jun 04, 2010 7:42 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Ven wrote:
Here's a reminder of what QE does to a market.


_______

I thought you were going to show us a chart of the S&P from 666.79 @ 3/6/09 to the recent highs @ April 26, of 1219.80 pulling the US back from the brink of financial armageddon - my bad Smile

Japan had other problems like not dealing with their banking via RTA like we did... back in the day when Seidman was banging heads.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Ven
Senior Poster
Senior Poster


Joined: 30 Dec 2009
Posts: 82

PostPosted: Fri Jun 04, 2010 7:05 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Here's a reminder of what QE does to a market.
Just look at this 20 year chart of Japan's Nikkei.

http://www.forecast-chart.com/historical-nikkei-225.html

Weakend currencies may cause short gains in markets,
but they do not support bull markets.

Look at all charts in any country in bonds, equities, commodities, whatever you wish to look at.

Strong markets always correlate with strong currencies.

I'm afraid you'll find your faith in QE is misplaced.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message

Please log in to view without the ad banners
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    MarketThoughts.com Forum Index -> Market Commentary All times are GMT - 6 Hours
Goto page 1, 2, 3 ... 22, 23, 24  Next
Page 1 of 24

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


|Payday Loan Today|BoatAngel Outreach Centers|Cash Advance|Credit Cards| Powered by phpBB